I find that sometimes when I've amassed a collection of difficult to find beers, there are often one or two that tend to sit around longer than the others, waiting to be tasted. It is not that I imagine they will be inferior, rather it is their perceived quality that persuades me to wait for that perfect moment. So it has been with the beers I collected from Russian River, a brewery in Santa Rosa, California, just north of San Francisco. Many consider Russian River to be among the very best micro-breweries in the US, a brewery that creates beers of nearly mythic reputation, such as Pliny the Elder, a beer some say is the greatest IPA ever brewed. This stellar reputation has caused me to hold off on trying Damnation, but no longer, the time is at hand.
Damnation is a highly carbonated beer that is a bright gold, and sports a beautifully thick, almost meringue-like head that only bottle fermented beer seems able to achieve. Its aroma has some sweet notes but is mostly reminiscent of champagne. The flavour is incredibly dry, again almost champagne-like in character, but does have some notes of apple and a very mild character of horse blanket. Its finish is again very dry, but not in a satisfying way, more in a bland and tasteless way that lacks complexity. I enjoyed this beer, but nowhere near as much as I had anticipated.
I was shocked by my impression of this beer, one I expected to blow me away. I suppose it goes to show the dangers involved when one has expectations about a beer before trying it (This obviously applies to much more than just beer). I was so surprised by this that I looked up the BJCP (Beer Judge Certification Program) style guidelines for Belgian Golden Strong Ale, to see if I was missing the point. Although, I don't really like rules that govern how beer should be, firm styles do give structure and allow us to group beers into categories in order to brew and understand them better. With brewing, as with so many things in life, it is necessary to know the rules before you can learn how to break the rules, and it is from this calculated deviation that some of the world's best beers are born. But I digress... big time. In the guidelines it states that the overall impression for a beer of this style is supposed to be "A golden, complex, effervescent, strong Belgian-style ale." It was the "complex" part that seemed to be missing and this is my main reason for liking but not loving this beer. I hope I don't get any hate mail over this review.
Rating: Good
It might be the hype I'm not sure. My experience with Pliny was less than I expected (perhaps you read the review on my blog). Age could conceivably play a factor in an IPA, but yours should have been as intended.
ReplyDeleteI did read your post on Pliny. My experience with it was much better, but it was on tap in Portland, so likely it was fresher. As far as Damnation, ya I figured the same as you, a bit of age shouldn't hurt a beer like that. Maybe it just wasn't my thing... by the way, I love your idea of a "Belgian Dark IPA." I just may have to try making one of those.
ReplyDeleteBB
Are oyu interested in joining the new Victoria homebrewer's guild? You might already be on the mailing list I'm not sure. If you are, send me your email. We're meeting soon.
ReplyDeleteI'm definitely interested and ya, I'm on the mailing list. I won't be around until the start of next month, but let me know how your first meetings go and I'll join in when I swing back through town. Looking forward to it.
ReplyDeleteBB